16 Jun 2025 18:15:40
Giants got: Rafael Devers

Red Sox got: Kyle Harrison, Jordan Hicks, James Tibbs, someone named Jose Bello.

Absolute highway robbery by Buster Posey.

1.) 22 Jun 2025
22 Jun 2025 02:57:10
The Giants may have been the only team in the league willing to take on that full contract. Devers is a fantastic hitter right now, but that's a ton of money for a DH that isn't in the best shape already at 28 years old.

We'll see about this one for Posey after his first big swing has been a whiff thus far.

2.) 22 Jun 2025
22 Jun 2025 21:50:15
If Devers was a free agent this winter, he'd make a whole lot more than 8 years, $250M, which is just about what the Giants are paying Devers. (The total dollars are less when you factor in Hicks' contract coming off the books) .

The Giants are getting Devers for about 100M less than he'd get in free agency. I also genuinely don't care that they'll be paying him a lot of money in 2030, or something like that. They are in a position to win it all right now. You try to win now.

Also, Posey's first big move was extending Chapman. He had to close the deal since Farhan Zaidi was unable to do so. That's been a pretty great deal. Either way, Willy Adames will be just fine. I'm not even slightly worried about three months' worth of production.

3.) 07 Jul 2025
07 Jul 2025 12:17:35
Willy Adames since he called Adames a "big whiff":

.354, 3 HR, 13 RBI, 1.022 OPS, 187 wRC+

Could you please say something bad about Patrick Bailey? He could use the boost, too.

4.) 27 Aug 2025
27 Aug 2025 05:43:22
welp.

Devers' wRC+ has dropped by over 30 points after the trade, and the Giants are literally the worst team in MLB since the deal.

oof. Breslow is chuckling.

5.) 11 Sep 2025
11 Sep 2025 19:38:01
"Devers' wRC+ has dropped by over 30 points after the trade. "

You said this on August 27, when his wRC+ was 138. His wRC+ with the Red Sox this season was 144. So that's a drop of six (6) points, not 30.

But hey, no one has ever accused you of being truthful, now have they?

Hilariously, you posted this at the end of August, when Devers hit for 176 wRC+ for the month.

6.) 11 Sep 2025
11 Sep 2025 19:43:31
"oof. Breslow is chuckling. "

Let's check in on the Red Sox return:

-Jordan Hicks has an 8.20 ERA, 1.73 points HIGHER than it was in San Francisco.

-Kyle Harrison has pitched 3 innings.

-James Tibbs was traded for Dustin May, who has a 5.40 ERA with the Red Sox.

Oh, and how has Boston's DH position done since Devers left?

103 wRC+. That's ACTUALLY 30 points lower than Devers' stint with the Giants. (Their 1B have hit 77 wRC+ since then. oof)

But hey, Breslow saved John Henry some money! Good for him, I guess.

7.) 11 Sep 2025
11 Sep 2025 19:57:48
Hey, speaking of "how'd this guy do after a trade"

How's Andrew Vaughn doing?

Before you get the chance to lie, I'll tell you:

He has a 1.5 fWAR and 140 wRC+ in 53 games.

Compare that to his 97 wRC+ and his -1.6 fWAR in 610 games in Chicago? Oofta. BIG time oofta.

Meanwhile, the guy they acquired for Andrew Vaughn? He's on the Cubs.

What an absolute disaster in Chicago.

8.) 12 Sep 2025
12 Sep 2025 18:27:54
"You said this on August 27, when his wRC+ was 138."

Yes, for the entire season. It was 111 in a Giants uniform from June 15 to Aug 26. Type into the Google machine, it's an awesome tool. Those details always seem to trip you up, kid. What's 144 minus 111?

The Red Sox are 15 games better since trading diva Devers.

Vaughn was also not a great guy in the clubhouse, and the White Sox are 7 games better since they dumped him, including a series win over the Giants. & they have better players in Vaughn's role now.

9.) 13 Sep 2025
13 Sep 2025 05:53:43
"In a Giants uniform"

Nice job on changing the scope of your argument after you were called out. His wRC+ IN A GIANTS UNIFORM is now 133. Wanna tell me: is that 30 points worse?

It's almost like we shouldn't call things over after just 2 months. I know that's awfully tough for a White Sox fan, where your season was over on February 1st, but it's just a good reminder.

Also, the Red Sox being better in the short-term is nothing. Devers is under contract for 8 more years. The Red Sox are going to walk into the winter having to find a replacement for a 140 wRC+ hitter (and they are losing Bregman, too) in a really weak FA class.

They'll be hard-pressed to find a comparable hitter as Devers for less than $250M this winter.

The Giants literally got a 140 wRC+ hitter for $250M and a few players they weren't going to use. You have to find a way to cope with how elite that trade was for San Francisco by looking at some hilariously small sample sizes.

"BuT bOsToN's ReCoRd PoSt TrAdE". Again, I don't care how Boston is doing post-trade. It means literally nothing for Rafael Devers or how he's done for the Giants as of late. The players the Giants gave up haven't done anything for them. It's 100% irrelevant, and you certainly know a thing or two about irrelevance, don't ya?

Now, go find other ways to cope with what is becoming your team's THIRD CONSECUTIVE 100-loss season.

Remember, these guys were the "Los Angeles Dodgers of the American League" LMAOOOOOOOOO.

Maybe your grandkids will be lucky enough to see a winning season again in the southside. I'm not holding my breath.

10.) 13 Sep 2025
13 Sep 2025 15:33:08
"Nice job on changing the scope of your argument after you were called out. "

I didn't change anything, you just struggle with basic reading comprehension. You got confused. If I'm going to make a point about Devers' performance in a Giants uniform, I'm not going to include his Red Sox numbers in the process. Hopefully you can understand that?

But, let's stick with the facts here:

On June 15, the Red Sox were 36-36 and they traded their all-world superstar to the Giants who sat at 41-30, firmly a playoff team.

Now, you'd think adding a 140 wRC+ hitter to your lineup would help that win% right? And be a pretty big blow to the team that lost him?

Nope, the Giants are 8 games worse and the Red Sox are a whopping 14 games better. So you say you don't care about the Red Sox record, but I'm sure you are about the Giants', no?

Now we know that correlation is not causation, but funny how that happens, right? Usually adding a player of Devers caliber helps the team, not significantly hurt it.

The Red Sox dealt Devers not because he couldn't play, but largely because he was a prima donna who turned into a pretty awful teammate. He was clearly hurting the team's morale because he selfishly had to be the center of attention. They are rolling since the dumped the headache that the Giants have started to suffer from.

The Red Sox had a great team with an exciting young player pool & the opportunity to sign another superstar that could help them win this season, but Raffy didn't care. For the objectively awful third baseman, that was "his position". Winning is not at the forefront of his desires, which is fine, he's certainly not the only player in MLB that feels that way. The Red Sox just weren't comfortable paying that much money to someone with that mentality. The Giants were.

The good thing about signing DHs (with attuite problems to boot) to massive contracts is that they usually always work out well for the club.

Oh, wait.

11.) 13 Sep 2025
13 Sep 2025 18:02:55
"So you say you don't care about the Red Sox record, but I'm sure you are about the Giants', no? "

Let me explain it this way:

To suggest that the Red Sox record without Devers is relevant is to say that Rafael Devers is a player that was LOSING them baseball games, which is perhaps the most nonsensical take you've ever had (and we have A LOT of candidates to choose from. )

Rafael Devers wasn't the reason for the Giants' awful July/ August slide. That was a team effort.

And as far as "he doesn't want to win" how has he played since your hilariously awful statement on August 26th? He has a 163 wRC+ over the past 30 days. He's probably the sole reason the Giants began are just 1 GB in the NL Wild Card right now.

And is Devers a bad teammate? No. He's not. How do you think the Red Sox had to justify the trade? By getting people like you to buy their answer hook, line and sinker.

Weird that when he comes over the Giants, he's more than happy to play DH or 1st Base, or even 3B on a rare occasion (because the Giants have one of the greatest defensive 3B of all time, Devers hasn't been needed there) .

Weird, if he was such a bad teammate, he wouldn't have played a new position like 1B when he arrived in San Francisco, now would he?

It's almost as if, and hear me out, the Red Sox lied about his character to justify to their fans why they traded away their best offensive player.

But I'm not going to expect a fan of a Jerry Reinsdorf team to understand when a front office/ leadership culture is toxic.

12.) 13 Sep 2025
13 Sep 2025 18:08:06
"The Red Sox had a great team with an exciting young player pool & the opportunity to sign another superstar that could help them win this season, but Raffy didn't care. For the objectively awful third baseman, that was "his position"

Boy, you'll believe any narrative that serves your own version of the truth, won't you?

Because that's not what happened. As corroborated by other Red Sox personnel and players, Devers was told he would remain 3B and Bregman would play 2B. That was changed, and Devers was asked to play DH. He was told he'd be the DH. He was okay with it. THEN, they asked him to move to 1B.

Devers' frustration wasn't the change of position, but the way expectations were communicated to him. Again, this position has been well-documented in The Athletic, the Boston Globe, ESPN, and other major outlets, including various Red Sox podcasts after the fact.

All signs point to the problem existing within the front office, not Devers. The toxicity of the front office has been corroborated by multiple former coaches, scouts and front office personnel.

If you want to buy into Craig Breslow's narrative on things, go for it. But as it the case with you, you're not siding with what has been proven time after time.

13.) 14 Sep 2025
14 Sep 2025 07:23:46
"To suggest that the Red Sox record without Devers is relevant is to say that Rafael Devers is a player that was LOSING them baseball games, which is perhaps the most nonsensical take you've ever had"

Nate, I know you never played sports, but I'll tell you that when you have a major "me" guy causing distractions on a daily basis, it has an effect on the team. It's pretty obvious that the Red Sox were fed up with him after he literally stopped showing up.

"Devers was told he would remain 3B and Bregman would play 2B. That was changed, and Devers was asked to play DH. He was told he'd be the DH. He was okay with it. THEN, they asked him to move to 1B.

Devers' frustration wasn't the change of position, but the way expectations were communicated to him. "

This narrative is such BS. It's not that complicated. The Red Sox wanted to make him their primary DH at least to start the year A. because Yoshida was hurt, B. because they had the opportunity to sign Alex Bregman (a better 3B than Devers) and C. because you, Nate, could probably play a better 3B than Rafael Devers. He has been objectively awful over there his entire career. They could have played Devers at 3B, but that

They only then asked him to play 1B because Casas literally blew out his knee and they didn't want to have to stick a rookie (Campbell) over there out of position when he's already adjusting to MLB. Face of the franchise leaders usually make that move without question for the betterment of the team, but, again, that's not Raffy.

Devers is certainly not the first guy to take the transition into DH-hood hard, but you can't just stop showing up to obligations. He handled the situation like a complete baby.

And just to quickly recap:

The Giants and Red Sox are 86-62 without Devers this year and 70-79 with him.

14.) 14 Sep 2025
14 Sep 2025 20:24:40
"This narrative is such BS. It's not that complicated. The Red Sox wanted to make him their primary DH at least to start the year"

How is it BS when there are MULTIPLE Red Sox PLAYERS who confirmed the fact that Devers was told he'd remain at 3B and who acknowledged the Red Sox front office wasn't being truthful about it?

Or when multiple former players, scouts and front office employees were coming out of the woodwork to suggest that Craig Breslow is a disaster to work with, I'm not sure I'm going to buy the narrative from him.

Or when Devers WILLINGLY moved to DH and then WILLINIGLY learned to play 1B when he got to San Francisco, because, well, the Giants communicated their expectations with him in initial conversations (something both Devers, his agent, and Buster Posey all acknowledged) .

But yeah, I'm not gonna buy the take of a guy who thought everyone was "emulating" a now-fired GM, or that his team was "the Los Angeles Dodgers of the American League"

Your commitment to writing fan fiction on this website is admirable, if nothing else.

15.) 14 Sep 2025
14 Sep 2025 21:32:18
And so we're clear, let's just look at Jeff Passan's article about the trade for key details:

-Devers was not even told that the Red Sox were looking at signing Bregman. In fact, all that was communicated to him was that "nothing was close. "
-They did sign Bregman, and Devers was told Bregman was playing 2B.
-They changed course, without consulting Devers (their franchise player and most expensive player), and Devers was left without a position. He was told by Cora to "leave his glove at home"
-Devers approached the Red Sox with a happy medium: ease into a new role. A few games at 3B, a few at DH. He was told no. (Yes, the Boston Red Sox REFUSED to have any flexibility to accommodate the player they gave over $300M to)
-Devers acquiesced and took on the DH role. Then, it was demanded he play 1B, shortly after being told he wouldn't be a fielder.

If you're keeping track at home, that's TWO position changes in the same amount of months. There's not an athlete in America who is going to be okay with that, even less so than one who is getting paid $300M by his team.

***
In the article, Passan even gets to the heart of the matter, "The day after the trade, when Breslow and Kennedy held media availability, they acknowledged the flaws in their process -- particularly Breslow needing to better communicate with players. "

Did you catch that? Even the Boston Red Sox themselves acknowledged the need for their GM to communicate better with players.

***

So, why the lie from the Red Sox?

I suppose it's to save face with their fans and otherwise ignorant people who can't be bothered with facts (such as you) . If the Red Sox can convince everyone that Devers is just this bad teammate with a bad attitude, maybe they'd forgive them.

I suppose there's also some ad hoc financial decisions to accommodate for FC Liverpool's (owned by Fenway Sports Group) record-breaking $565M in transfer spending. Henry had to find a way to foot that bill, and getting rid of $250+ million elsewhere in the organization allowed for some financial freedom.

But the Passan article lays out the facts, which pretty clearly do not depict a "bad teammate with an ego" but rather, a front office that clearly mishandled a tailor-made situation for their franchise, and it resulted in a fan favorite going somewhere else (and the organization getting merely packing peanuts in return) .

To sum it all up: the facts are clearly not on your side here. That seems to be par for the course with you lately.

16.) 15 Sep 2025
15 Sep 2025 05:31:45
Poor Raffy Devers, man. He got his feelings hurt because he was one of the worst defenders in baseball and the Red Sox were rightfully looking for him to move on from him as their 3B. If that caught him off guard, then he's an idiot.

" (Yes, the Boston Red Sox REFUSED to have any flexibility to accommodate the player they gave over $300M to) "

He been worth -62 (NEGATIVE 62! ) DRS over his career at 3B and -27 OAA. That's a whole 14 runs worse than the next closest 3AB. Forget leaving your glove at home, go ahead and donate it to Goodwill. He deserves no happy medium playing that kind of defense over 8000+ innings

So guess what dude, yeah, you're going to DH, and since we're a club with world series aspirations, when our 1B blows out his knee, maybe you could try to stick it out at 1B for a while?

Devers chose the alternative of simply not showing up - a true professional. Acting like he was in no way in the wrong is funny. He got butthurt.

You always think you're onto something with that Dodgers comment thing from almost 6 years ago at this point, lol. It's so tired at this point, man. At that time, the White Sox were one of the best teams in baseball & you were still making fake accounts so that someone on here would agree with you.

Time to move on to new stuff, maybe like how the Sox got an awful return for Garrett Crochet? That has aged well.

17.) 15 Sep 2025
15 Sep 2025 12:54:28
"He got his feelings hurt because he was one of the worst defenders in baseball and the Red Sox were rightfully looking for him to move on from him as their 3B. If that caught him off guard, then he's an idiot. "

Red Sox: Hey Raffy, you're our $300M third baseman. That's your role going forward.

Red Sox: Hey Raffy, we were talking to teams about other third basemen, but don't worry, nothing is particularly close and we probably won't land one anyway. Enjoy your winter, we'll see you in February!

Red Sox: Sooooo, much to our surprise, we actually landed a 3B. But don't worry, Raffy, Alex Bregman is going to be our second baseman. No worries about those expectations. You're still our third baseman.

Red Sox: Hey man, you're not our third baseman. Please discard your glove and prepare to be a DH.

Raffy: Can I at least play 3B a few days and ease into the new position?

Red Sox: HOW CAN YOU BE SO UNREASONABLE AND EGOTISTICAL? YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO DO WHAT'S BEST FOR OUR TEAM! Actually, Raffy, while we're being reasonable, we're asking you to go get your glove back, and learn a position you've never played before. And if you don't do everything we demand, we're going to publicly excoriate you and treat you like the bad guy. We're DEFINITELY not the bad guys here.

***

Weird that you'll harp on Rafael Devers for having some issues wiith how his former team treated him and not have any issues with a front office who literally couldn't be bothered to communicate with their player. That's all Devers wanted from his team: communication.

How do I know this? Because he was MORE THAN WILLING to play 1B and DH for the Giants. Why was he willing? Because they communicated their expectations with him.

If you want to continue to believe a completely false narrative that guys like Jeff Passan threw the coldest of water on, go ahead. I won't stop you from believing a lie. But just so we're loud and clear: Boston's narrative on the Devers situation has been debunked at literally every single point.

But again, you don't care about any of this. You just want to stand on a fully-debunked narrative because it helps you "dunk" on the Giants. Which is such a weird stance to make here. I guess I don't blame you: hitching your fandom to a team that is on track for 320 losses in 3 years probably makes you need to look elsewhere for some interesting baseball.

But hey, at least you have Kyle Teel. Maybe he'll be a part of the NEXT "Los Angeles Dodgers of the American League. " I personally can't wait for the "every MLB GM is trying to emulate Chris Getz" stuff in a few seasons when the White Sox suddenly win more than 62 games in a season.

18.) 15 Sep 2025
15 Sep 2025 15:40:44
Seriously, if you've been tracking with what has been well-documented publicly about this situation, and your takeaway is that Rafael Devers was the bad guy in any of this, you might actually be a moron.

But then again, you were the same guy who vehemently defended the White Sox front office for hiring Tony La Russa, so I'm not going to accuse you of having any scruples.

Expecting a player to change his own position (a position the Red Sox were MORE than happy to pay him $300M to play) not once but TWICE in a Major League season doesn't make you the reasonable party. If you really think that the Red Sox were at all reasonable, then you've displayed just how worthless you are.

19.) 15 Sep 2025
15 Sep 2025 16:05:46
And lastly, if you want to convince yourself that an organization that burned bridges with Mookie Betts, Chris Sale, Xander Bogaerts, Terry Francona and others is somehow, suddenly, the good guys in this, again, I won't stop you.

But the Red Sox have a lengthy recent history of mishandling these situations, and I don't know if you're being serious in giving them the benefit of the doubt here or if you're doubling down and tripling down on slandering Rafael Devers' character all for the purpose of trying to "win" some conversation on this site.

If it's the latter, you should probably do some serious self-inventory, because you've let an online discussion cloud your ability to see the truth of a situation.

20.) 15 Sep 2025
15 Sep 2025 17:34:16
I am not disputing Passan's account of how it went down. I'm saying that if that's true, Devers is overly sensitive.

In fact, when they extended him in 2023, Devers had actually shown some improvement at 3B in 2022 - still bad, but better (-6 DRS, -2 OAA) . They probably told him he'd remain at 3B. But since that extension, he went back to being BY FAR the worst third baseman in baseball. The Red Sox were rightfully done. No matter how much he was getting paid, he was awful.

Obviously when negotiating with Bregman (and also trying to get Kristian Campbell and Marcelo Mayer at-bats), they realized that the best version of the Boston Red Sox was with Devers not at third. If Devers was too stubborn to realize that, then I don't know what to tell him. It's a business and you're an adult. If he wanted to be the definite 3B without any other consideration, maybe don't be the worst in baseball over two seasons. Again, this had been turned into some sort of complex communication riddle.

Bottom line: he sucked and lost his job and he cried about it. The Red sox moved him and got better after shedding the distraction.

Players get forced in to DH-hood all the time. They usually aren't happy, but they usually realize that they a. probably suck in the field and b. the team has someone clearly better. What those players pretty much never do is throw a temper tantrum and stop coming to work.

Oh, and I just hope that Kyle Teel will be as good as you assured me that Joey Bart would be.

21.) 16 Sep 2025
16 Sep 2025 12:34:29
"It's a business and you're an adult. "

So we're clear: Rafael Devers, who expected his employer to communicate properly and clearly with him about his role on the team, he's a baby because he was (rightly) upset that his employer was jerking him around and not communicating with him.

But the Boston Red Sox, Craig Breslow and John Henry, who have a lengthy history of mishandling player situations, of running off excellent baseball players, coaches and front office personnel, they aren't in the wrong at all here?

There's no expectation, by you, for the Boston Red Sox to communicate clearly, and they aren't at fault for doing so?

The (very, very short term) ends justify the means? Because they won some games in 2025, clearly, they were right to mistreat a player and mishandle a situation with their objectively best offensive player?

What if, and I know this might be a surprise to you, winning in one season isn't always indicative of long-term success?

If anyone should understand how colossally stupid it is to rely on a season or two of success as a barometer for the front office, it should be a Chicago White Sox fan.

You know, the team who had a GM "everyone was emulating? "
The team that was deemed the "Los Angeles Dodgers of the American League"

After they had two (2) winning seasons (one of those being a COVID-shortened season) and won one (1) playoff game.

Maybe, just maybe, we shouldn't trust that some immediate short-term wins are indicative of a team that's doing things the right way.

Running off your franchise stars is generally not a great long-term strategy, and the Red Sox have done it now with FOUR of their players. Two of those players, by the way, have won major awards after leaving.

But no, Rafael Devers is the bad guy here. Go ahead and malign someone's character because you want to win an internet debate, you continue to display your own character here. It's kinda pathetic tbh.

22.) 16 Sep 2025
16 Sep 2025 12:54:41
Also, where are you getting that Devers "didn't show up? "

All we know is that Rafael Devers pushed back his Spring Training debut because he was recovering from a procedure on his shoulder in the offseason.

Please back up your claim from a reliable, industry-trusted source. (I say that to remind you that Bennett Karoll is not a "journalist")

23.) 16 Sep 2025
16 Sep 2025 20:41:28
Buster Onley reported that on Sunday Night Baseball the day he was traded. He was supposed to show up to certain team "events", I assume marketing stuff, charity, etc. and he stopped showing up. It was one of the nails in the coffin.

Onley also reported that most execs he talked to around the league, though faulting the Red Sox for faulty communication, were "appalled" by how Devers handled the situation. Forget having to take on the contract, there were probably a lot of good teams that didn't want to touch Diva Devers with a ten foot pole because they didn't want what has happened to the Giants to happen to them.

Even when he got to SF, he was supposed to work with Will Clark at 1B and he blew him off too. It's an extremely entitled guy.

"So we're clear: Rafael Devers, who expected his employer to communicate properly and clearly with him about his role on the team, he's a baby because he was (rightly) upset that his employer was jerking him around and not communicating with him. "

Yes, be a man and don't ghost Alex Cora and the owner of the team when they try and talk to you about the issue. He should realize that he's an abhorrent fielder & the club was trying to put him and, get this, THE TEAM in a better spot to succeed.

"Jerking him around". Give me an effing break. Let's hold these guys to a higher standard over a warranted position change. Honestly, Nate, you seem to be the only one jerking him around.

You just better hope that Devers doesn't go full Pablo Sandoval here soon. He's already fat at 28 years old with declining bat speed and rising K rates that is a complete liability in the field.

24.) 17 Sep 2025
16 Sep 2025 22:31:04
"Even when he got to SF, he was supposed to work with Will Clark at 1B and he blew him off too"

If anyone should need further evidence that Chi Sox will believe ANY narrative, there it is.

Let's see what the TRUTH was about that story:

“I know what the (expletive) happened, ” Clark said. “I said, he didn’t want to go out and be at first base and be 20 feet in front of their freaking dugout with what went on in Boston, and now he’s working with me at first base. He didn’t want to have to go through all that (expletive) through the press in the media. So, I completely understand. ”

***

"be a man and don't ghost Alex Cora and the owner of the team when they try and talk to you about the issue"

Once again, you're lying. Devers didn't answer Cora's texts because he was off the grid in the Dominican Republic. Alex Cora even acknowledged this later on and pointed out that he had no issue with it, personally.

This wasn't "ghosting" or avoidance of the issue. It was literally a player in the offseason who wanted to focus on his ability to retreat. Acting like it's a character flaw is a grotesque misrepresentation of the truth, and I suspect you know this and you simply don't care.

***

Your continued misrepresentation of the truth is actually becoming a character issue for you.

But I shouldn't be surprised, considered how you carried water for the White Sox when they hired Tony La Russa. This is just par for the course with you: you're willing to lie about a minority player (not your first instance of being against them on this site) and malign his character.

So we're gonna consider this conversation over. If you want to believe your lies, knock yourself out. I won't stop you. But I'm not interested in debating this topic with a guy who has outed himself as a pretty awful human.

Bye.

25.) 17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025 05:00:46
LOL. We've gotten to the race baiting part of the conversation. You usually get to that when you've ran into a wall with your arguments and you're out of other options.

Gee, I hope the league outlaws those racist contract extensions in the next CBA! That was an all-time take.

Or remember when you came at Tim Anderson's character? But no, not anything race related there from the supporter of the Walter Johnson-owned team, right?

"he didn’t want to go out and be at first base and be 20 feet in front of their freaking dugout with what went on in Boston"

So he was scared of the Red Sox org at this point? Poor guy!

Nate, quick, make a new account and have them agree with you! LMAOOO.

26.) 17 Sep 2025
17 Sep 2025 15:58:48
"Or remember when you came at Tim Anderson's character? "

Ahh, yes, coming at the character of a guy who literally assaulted a baseball official. And a guy who instigated multiple fights on a baseball field. You know, incredibly public incidents with minimal nuance to the situations.

Totally the same thing as taking a multi-layered story about Rafael Devers and Boston's relationship and using it to call him lazy (fat), a bad teammate, a crybaby and someone with bad character.

TOTALLY the same.

At this point, I'm beyond questioning your intelligence. I'm actually now questioning your integrity and your character. And I won't continue discussing with someone who is objectively a bad person.

Go find someone else to beef with. You've fed the meter enough.

27.) 18 Sep 2025
18 Sep 2025 06:08:05
"Your continued misrepresentation of the truth"

Shot.

"coming at the character of a guy who literally assaulted a baseball official"

Chaser.