MLB Trade Rumors Member Posts

 

Tigers16's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded


Tigers16's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Tigers16's Posts

 

 

To Tigers16's last 5 rumours posts

 

To Tigers16's last 5 rumour replies

 

Tigers16's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Tigers16's rumours posts

 

18 May 2017 20:11:32
Long way away, but if the Tigers find themselves out of the race around the deadline, they may have a few good pieces to move. Here's a few general ideas.

Tigers trade:

JD Martinez

Dodgers trade:

Alex Verdugo and a
mid level P prospect Dustin May or Josh Sborz

Verdugo may seem like a high price for a rental but Martinez is truly a game changing bat.

Tigers trade:
Justin Wilson (controllable through 2018)

Nationals trade:
RHP Eric Fedde or OF Andrew Stevenson

Everybody knows how valuable bullpens are come playoff time. Wilson would be a hot commodity as a power lefty who brings it at 97. Other teams like the Astros, Cubs, Dodgers to name a few will be after bullpen help as well.

Tigers16

1.) 19 May 2017 01:24:30
JD is old and not a great fielder and the offense doesn't overshadow the defense.


2.) 19 May 2017 02:39:14
I don't think the Dodgers would give up Verdugo, who is really close to the majors, for a rental of Martinez.

And there's almost no chance of the Tigers getting that for Justin Wilson.


3.) 19 May 2017 04:33:14
Doyers, Martinez is only 28, not exactly old.

But the Dodgers aren't paying that price for him.


4.) 19 May 2017 19:52:15
^Correction, Martinez is 29. (I did the math wrong from his DOB) . Still, he's not "old"


5.) 23 May 2017 15:50:08
There is no way the Nats would give away those players, especially Stevenson. Eaton injured, so Stevenson will be promoted in September. Werth and Harper are almost gone too.


 

 

11 Nov 2016 21:55:33
Tigers trade:

Ian Kinsler

Dodgers trade:

Alex Verdugo
Micah Johnson

The Dodgers in win now mode acquire one of the best all around second baseman in the league. He brings intensity to the field and plays the game hard. Exactly the type of player the Dodgers need atop their lineup. Though 34, he is signed relatively cheap for 2017 with a cheap option for 2018 as well. In return the Tigers get a young up and coming outfielder in Verdugo, and also a Johnson who has medium upside as speed is a big part of his game.

Tigers16

1.) 12 Nov 2016 03:19:58
I think the idea of Kinsler to LA is certainly fine. Details need work.


 

 

08 Nov 2016 01:37:19
Tigers trade:
JD Martinez

Blue Jays trade:
Dalton Pompey/ Anthony Alford
Sean Reid Foley/ Connor Greene

Blue Jays get a legitimate middle of the order bat to replace the probable loss of Encarncion and Bautista. Martinez is under contract for one more year at a very cheap price of 11MM for his production. Tigers get a young athletic cost controlled option for center field and an up and coming, potential middle of the rotation starter.

Tigers16

1.) 08 Nov 2016 12:10:36
Jays aren't going to give up 4 prospects for 1 year of Martinez. they will find somebody to DH.


2.) 08 Nov 2016 14:08:52
Good grief this is terrible. For reasons why it is terrible, Minnow laid it out rather well.

Martinez isn't THAT good.


3.) 08 Nov 2016 14:24:22
Martinez is very good. But I think Toronto would shy away from that deal.


4.) 08 Nov 2016 17:07:42
Martinez is not worth a teams top 4 prospects, two of them being top 100 prospects and 1 being an MLB-ready center fielder.

Martinez has 1-year left on his deal. No one is mortgaging the future for a player in his walk year.


5.) 09 Nov 2016 15:21:01
The proposal is not for all 4. It's for 2 of them. The / signifies you get either/ or.


6.) 10 Nov 2016 03:51:04
that makes more sense. I should have read it again.

But I believe Jays would rather give up prospects for someone other than Martinez.


 

 

 

Tigers16 has no Banter Posts

 

 

Tigers16's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

22 Jun 2017 13:36:15
The fir is perfect. But no way Indians give up Mejia for a pure rental. Divisional trade also gives me doubt.

Tigers16

 

 

Click To View This Thread

09 Nov 2016 15:21:01
The proposal is not for all 4. It's for 2 of them. The / signifies you get either/ or.

Tigers16

 

 

 

Tigers16 has no Banter Replies